119 translations of 134 that include the New Testament
Tagged text: STEPBible Translators Amalgamated (TAHOT / TAGNT), CC BY 4.0. Select a word for its lexicon entry.
Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it hath the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be reckoned after the order of Aaron?
Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it had the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be reckoned after the order of Aaron?
Now if perfection could have been attained through the Levitical priesthood (for on this basis the people received the law), why was there still need for another priest to appear—one in the order of Melchizedek and not in the order of Aaron?
Now if it was possible for things to be made complete through the priests of the house of Levi (for the law was given to the people in connection with them), what need was there for another priest who was of the order of Melchizedek and not of the order of Aaron?
If indeed then perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, for the people had their law given to them in connexion with it, what need [was there] still that a different priest should arise according to the order of Melchisedec, and not be named after the order of Aaron?
If then perfection was by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise according to the order of Melchisedech, and not be called according to the order of Aaron?
If therefore perfection had bene by the Priesthoode of the Leuites (for vnder it the Lawe was established to the people) what needed it furthermore, that another Priest should rise after the order of Melchi-sedec, and not to be called after the order of Aaron?
If indeed perfection had been by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people hath received the Law,) what further need was there that a different priest should arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called alter the order of Aaron?
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
Now if perfection could have been attained through the Levitical priesthood (for on this basis the people received the law), why was there still need for another priest to appear—one in the order of Melchizedek and not in the order of Aaron?
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
If, then, perfection had been attainable through the Levitical priesthood – and it was under this priesthood that the people received the Law – why was it still necessary that a priest of a different order should appear, a priest of the order of Melchizedek and not of the order of Aaron?
If, then, perfection had been attainable through the Levitical priesthood – and it was under this priesthood that the people received the Law – why was it still necessary that a priest of a different order should appear, a priest of the order of Melchizedek and not of the order of Aaron?
Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it hath the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be reckoned after the order of Aaron?
Yf now therfore perfeccion came by the presthod of the levites (for vnder that presthod the people recaved the lawe) what neded it furthermore that an other prest shuld ryse after the order of Melchisedech and not after the order of Aaron?
Now if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
Now if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
Now if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
Now if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
Now if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
Now if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
Now if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
Now if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
If indeed, then, perfection were through the Levitical priesthood — for the people under it had received law — what further need, according to the order of Melchisedek, for another priest to arise, and not to be called according to the order of Aaron?
Now if perfection had been attainable through the Levitical priesthood (for under this priesthood the people received the law), what further need would there have been for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek rather than the order of Aaron?
CC BY 4.0
Now if shleimut (completeness) had been attainable through the Kehunah of Levi — for under it came the Mattan Torah (giving of the Torah) to the Am Brit — what further need would there have been to speak of another KOHEN arising “according to the order of Malki-Tzedek” rather than “al divrati Aharon”?
CC BY 4.0
فَلَوْ كَانَ بِٱلْكَهَنُوتِ ٱللَّاوِيِّ كَمَالٌ - إِذِ ٱلشَّعْبُ أَخَذَ ٱلنَّامُوسَ عَلَيْهِ - مَاذَا كَانَتِ ٱلْحَاجَةُ بَعْدُ إِلَى أَنْ يَقُومَ كَاهِنٌ آخَرُ عَلَى رُتْبَةِ مَلْكِي صَادَقَ؟ وَلَا يُقَالُ عَلَى رُتْبَةِ هَارُونَ.
ଆରେକ୍ ହେଁ, ଜୁୟ୍ ଲେବିୟ ଜାଜକ୍ହଃଦ୍ ତଃଳେ ଲକ୍ମଃନ୍ ବିଦି ହାୟ୍ଲାୟ୍, ସେ ଜାଜକ୍ହଃଦ୍ ଦଃୟ୍ ଜଦି ସିଦ୍ ଲାବ୍ ଅୟ୍ରିଲେକ୍, ସେତଃନ୍ ଅୟ୍ଲେକ୍ ହାରଣାର୍ ଇସାବ୍ ହଃର୍କାରେ ଗଃଣିତା ନଃୟ୍କଃରି ମଲ୍କିସେଦକାର୍ ହର୍ ବିନ୍ ଗଟେକ୍ ଜାଜକ୍ ବାରାଉତାର୍ ଆର୍ କାୟ୍ ଲଳା ରିଲି ?
CC BY 4.0
Ashuwotssh nemo ime Lewi kahaniyo weerone, Lewawino etefanoots kahni weeran s'een woto daatsere wotink'ere Aron kahny naasho b́woterawon Melkes'edik' naash detstso k'osh kahniyo b́woo geyirawnk'ee b́teshi,
CC BY 4.0
Lewi phabithek è Israel pha bran shii Iphey phi. Thuh, Lewi pha phabi ne blia shii khriig rey arone, Aron è asi pha, hanyie jia Melkhizedek phabi lumuii shii gai ichua pha phabi khia phane achid ro.
CC BY 4.0
ဣသရေလအမျိုးသားတို့၏ပညတ်တရား ကိုပေးအပ်ရာ၌ လေဝိအနွယ်ဝင်ယဇ်ပုရော ဟိတ်များကိုအခြေခံ၍ပေးအပ်ခြင်းဖြစ်၏။ အကယ်၍လေဝိအနွယ်ဝင်ယဇ်ပုရောဟိတ် တို့သည်ပြီးပြည့်စုံလင်အောင်ဆောင်ရွက်နိုင် ကြပါမူ အာရုန်၏အရိုက်အရာအစားမေ လခိဇေဒက်၏အရိုက်အရာကိုဆက်ခံသူ အခြားယဇ်ပုရောဟိတ်တစ်ပါးပေါ်ထွန်း လာရန်မလိုပေ။-
တနည်းကား၊ လေဝိ မှဆင်းသက်သော ယဇ် ပုရောဟိတ်အမျိုးနှင့် စပ်ဆိုင်လျက်လူ များတို့သည် ပညတ် တရားတော်ကို ခံကြသောကြောင့် ၊ ထိုအမျိုးအားဖြင့် စုံလင် ခြင်းသို့ ရောက် နိုင်သည်မှန် လျှင် ၊ အခြား သော ယဇ် ပုရောဟိတ်သည်၊ အာရုန် နည်းတူ မ ခေါ်ဝေါ် ဘဲ၊ မေလခိဇေဒက် နည်းတူ ပေါ်ထွန်း စရာအကြောင်း အဘယ်သို့ ရှိ သေး သနည်း
Isarel khyange veia levih ktaiyü ninga Thum cun jah peta kyaki. Levih ktaiyüea bilawh hin a kümcei ania kyak üng ktaiyü akce a po law vai am hlü, acun hin Aron üngkhyüh am kya lü Melkhihzadek üngkhyüh vai ni.
CC BY 4.0
Levinawk mah qaima toksakhaih rang hoiah akoephaih hnu o nahaeloe, (anih khae hoiah ni kaminawk mah kaalok to hnuk o) tipongah Aaron baktiah kawk ai ah, Melkhizedik baktiah kalah qaima angzoh han angai vop loe?
Levi khosoih lamloh hmakhahnah a om tangloeng atah pilnam loh amah soah ol a rhi coeng. Melkhizedek kah aitlaeng bangla a tloe khosoih aka phoe taengah banim a ngoe pueng? Aron kah aitlaeng bangla khue pawt nim?
Levi khosoih lamloh hmakhahnah a om tangloeng atah pilnam loh amah soah ol a rhi coeng. Melkhizedek kah aitlaeng bangla a tloe khosoih aka phoe taengah banim a ngoe pueng? Aron kah aitlaeng bangla khue pawt nim?
从前百姓在 利未人祭司职任以下受律法，倘若借这职任能得完全，又何用另外兴起一位祭司，照 麦基洗德的等次，不照 亚伦的等次呢？
從前百姓在 利未人祭司職任以下受律法，倘若藉這職任能得完全，又何用另外興起一位祭司，照 麥基洗德的等次，不照 亞倫的等次呢？
如果完全是借着利未的祭司职分而有的——因为百姓是在这职分之下领受了律法——那么，为什么还需要另有一位祭司照麦基洗德的等次兴起，而不称为照亚伦的等次呢？
Kopochela mu umbopesi wa Ŵalawi ŵandu ŵa ku Isilaeli ŵapegwilwe lilajisyo. Sambano iŵaga masengo ga umbopesi u che Lawi gamalile ngakukasachilwe kutyochela umbopesi wine waukuyiye umbopesi wa Melikisedeki ni ngaŵa umbopesi u che Haluni.
CC BY 4.0
ⲒⲤϪⲈ ⲘⲈⲚ ⲞⲨⲚ ⲚⲀⲢⲈ ⲠϪⲰⲔ ⲈⲂⲞⲖ ϢⲞⲠ ⲠⲈ ⲈⲂⲞⲖ ϨⲒⲦⲈⲚ ϮⲘⲈⲦⲞⲨⲎⲂ ⲚⲦⲈⲠⲒⲖⲈⲨⲒⲦⲎ ⲤⲈⲦⲀⲨϮ ⲚⲞⲘⲞⲤ ⲄⲀⲢ ⲘⲠⲒⲖⲀⲞⲤ ϨⲒⲰⲦⲤ ⲒⲈ ⲚⲈⲦⲬⲢⲒⲀ ⲞⲨ ⲦⲈ ⲔⲀⲦⲀ ⲦⲦⲀⲜⲒⲤ ⲘⲘⲈⲖⲬⲒⲤⲈⲆⲈⲔ ⲈⲐⲢⲈϤϢⲰⲠⲒ ⲚϪⲈⲔⲈⲞⲨⲎⲂ ⲞⲨⲞϨ ⲈⲚⲈϪⲞⲤ ⲀⲚ ϪⲈ ⲔⲀⲦⲀ ⲦⲦⲀⲜⲒⲤ ⲚⲀⲀⲢⲰⲚ.
ⲓⲥϫⲉ ⲙⲉⲛ ⲟⲩⲛ ⲛⲁⲣⲉ ⳿ⲡϫⲱⲕ ⳿ⲉⲃⲟⲗ ϣⲟⲡ ⲡⲉ ⳿ⲉⲃⲟⲗ ϩⲓⲧⲉⲛ ϯⲙⲉⲧⲟⲩⲏⲃ ⳿ⲛⲧⲉ ⲡⲓⲗⲉⲩⲓⲧⲏ ⲥ ⲉⲧⲁⲩϯ ⲛⲟⲙⲟⲥ ⲅⲁⲣ ⳿ⲙⲡⲓⲗⲁⲟⲥ ϩⲓⲱⲧⲥ ⲓⲉ ⲛⲉ ⳿ⲧⲭⲣⲓⲁ ⲟⲩ ⲧⲉ ⲕⲁⲧⲁ ⳿ⲧⲧⲁⲝⲓⲥ ⳿ⲙⲙⲉⲗⲭⲓⲥⲉⲇⲉⲕ ⲉⲑⲣⲉϥϣⲱⲡⲓ ⳿ⲛϫⲉ ⲕⲉⲟⲩⲏⲃ ⲟⲩⲟϩ ⲉⲛⲉϫⲟⲥ ⲁⲛ ϫⲉ ⲕⲁⲧⲁ ⳿ⲧⲧⲁⲝⲓⲥ ⳿ⲛ⳿ⲁ⳿ⲁⲣⲱⲛ.
Da se dakle savršenstvo postiglo po levitskom svećeništvu - jer na temelju njega narod je dobio Zakon - koja bi onda bila potreba da se po redu Melkisedekovu postavi drugi svećenik i da se ne imenuje po redu Aronovu?
A protož byla-liť dokonalost spasení skrze Levítské kněžství, (nebo za toho kněžství vydán jest lidu Zákon,) jakáž toho byla potřeba, aby jiný kněz podle řádu Melchisedechova povstal, a nebyl již více podle řádu Aronova jmenován?
Hvis der altså var Fuldkommelse at få ved det levitiske Præstedømme (thi på Grundlag af dette har jo Folket fået Loven), hvilken Trang var der da yderligere til, at en anden Slags Præst skulde opstå efter Melkisedeks Vis og ikke nævnes efter Arons Vis?
ଲେବିର୍ ନାତିତିତି ପୁଜାରି ଇସାବେ ବାଚ୍ଲାର୍ପାଇ ପର୍ମେସର୍ ତାର୍ ନିୟମ୍ ଜିଉଦିମନ୍କେ ଦେଇରଇଲା । ମାତର୍ ଲେବି ବଁସର୍ ପୁଜାରିମନ୍ ଜଦି ସିଦ୍ଲକ୍ ଅଇରଇତାଇ ଆଲେ, ଆରି ଗଟେକ୍ ପୁଜାରି ଆଇବାକେ ଦର୍କାର୍ ନ ରଇଲା । ସେନ୍ତାର୍ ଏ ପୁଜାରି ଆରଣ୍ ଜେ କି ଲେବିର୍ ନାତିତିତି ରଇଲା, ତାର୍ ପୁଜାରିପଦ୍ ନ ଦାରି ମଲ୍କିସେଦକର ପୁଜାରି ପଦ୍ ଦାରି ଆଇସି ।
CC BY 4.0
Levita Priesta ngamalkijiribani manamirila jinkinani, (ngangau jendrangundruja kana wolarali jirijiribani jaura manina wonti) minandru ngadani Priesta pilki, Melchisedekani manginani terkakananto, ja wata Aaronani manginani?
Indien dan nu de volkomenheid door het Levietische priesterschap ware (want onder hetzelve heeft het volk de wet ontvangen), wat nood was het nog, dat een ander priester naar de ordening van Melchizedek zou opstaan, en die niet zou gezegd worden te zijn naar de ordening van Aaron?
Zo dus de volmaaktheid bereikt was door het levietische priesterschap—want daarop berustte de wetgeving voor het volk waarom zou het dan nog nodig geweest zijn, dat er een andere Priester werd aangesteld “naar de Orde van Melkisedek,” en dat Hij niet naar de orde van Aäron werd genoemd?
Tial, se ekzistis perfekteco per la Levida pastreco (ĉar sub ĝi la popolo ricevis la leĝon), kia plua bezono estis, ke leviĝu alia pastro laŭ la maniero de Melkicedek, kaj ne estu nomata laŭ la maniero de Aaron?
Si donc la perfection était par la sacrificature lévitique, (car c’est en relation avec elle que le peuple a reçu sa loi,) quel besoin était-il encore qu’un autre sacrificateur se lève selon l’ordre de Melchisédec et qui ne soit pas nommé selon l’ordre d’Aaron ?
Si donc la perfection s'était trouvée dans le sacerdoce lévitique (car c'est à celui-ci que se rapporte la loi donnée au peuple), qu'était-il encore besoin qu'il s'élevât un autre Sacrificateur, selon l'ordre de Melchisédec, et non selon l'ordre d'Aaron?
Si donc la perfection avait été possible par le sacerdoce Lévitique, car c’est sur ce sacerdoce que repose la loi donnée au peuple, qu’était-il encore besoin qu’il parût un autre sacrificateur selon l’ordre de Melchisédek, et non selon l’ordre d’Aaron?
Si donc la perfection avait pu être atteinte par le sacerdoce lévitique — car c'est sous ce sacerdoce que le peuple a reçu la loi — pourquoi fallait-il encore qu'un autre prêtre se lève selon l'ordre de Melchisédek plutôt que selon celui d'Aaron ?
Paacey baynda poloy bettidayne wogay derezas immetiday Lewe qesetetha mala gididako Aaroone mala gidontta Malke-xedeqe shuumetetha malay hara qessey yaanas aazas koshidee?
CC BY 4.0
ଆକେନ୍ ଲେବୀୟଇଂନେ ପୁଜାରି କାମ୍କେ ରାସିଂଚେ ଇସ୍ରାଏଲ୍ ଜାତିକେ ମେଁନେ ନିୟମ୍ ବିଃବଗେ । ଲେବୀୟଇଂନେ କାମ୍ ଜଦି ସାରାସାରି ଡିଂପାୱେ ତେଲା ହାରୋଣନେ ଉଙ୍ଗ୍ଡେ ଆକେନ୍ ଲେବୀୟ ପୁଜାରିଇଂକେ ଆନ୍ତାର୍ବିଚେ ମଲ୍କିସେଦକନେ ଉଙ୍ଗ୍ଡେ ରକମ୍ ବିନ୍ ମୁଇଙ୍ଗ୍ ପୁଜାରି ଜାତିନେ ଦର୍କାର୍ ଆଲେଃଗେ ।
CC BY 4.0
Wenn nun die Vollkommenheit durch das levitische Priestertum wäre (denn in Verbindung mit demselben hat das Volk das Gesetz empfangen), welches Bedürfnis war noch vorhanden, daß ein anderer Priester nach der Ordnung Melchisedeks aufstehe, und nicht nach der Ordnung Aarons genannt werde?
Ist nun die Vollkommenheit durch das levitische Priestertum geschehen (denn unter demselben hat das Volk das Gesetz empfangen), was ist denn weiter not zu sagen, daß ein anderer Priester aufkommen solle nach der Ordnung Melchisedeks und nicht nach der Ordnung Aarons?
Hätte es nun eine Vollendung durch das Levitische Priestertum gegeben (die Gesetzgebung des Volkes gieng ja auf dasselbe), wozu war es dann noch nötig, daß ein anderer Priester nach der Ordnung Melchisedek aufgestellt und nicht nach der Ordnung Aarons benannt wird?
Wenn nun das Vollkommenheit wäre, was durch das levitische Priestertum kam (denn unter diesem hat das Volk das Gesetz empfangen), wozu wäre es noch nötig, daß ein anderer Priester «nach der Ordnung Melchisedeks» auftrete und nicht einer «nach der Ordnung Aarons» bezeichnet werde?
CC BY 4.0
Isra7eele asaas higgey Leewe kahinetethaa baggara imettis. Ha Leewe kahinetethay polo gididabaa gidiyakko Aaronayssa mela gidonnashin, Melkkexedeqe mela hara kahine shuumanaw ays koshshidee?
CC BY 4.0
Levi buolu kopadicianba tuonli yaali yaapo ke U tienu den teni li balimaama Isaleleenba yaaba li yaabi tie ke ñani ki dagidi cain, naani li go bi tie tiladi kopadiciantoa n cua nani Melikisedeki yeni, ki naa tie Alono buolu yua?
CC BY 4.0
Εἰ μὲν οὖν τελείωσις διὰ τῆς Λευϊτικῆς ἱερωσύνης ἦν· ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἐπ᾽ αὐτῇ νενομοθέτητο· τίς ἔτι χρεία it κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισεδὲκit* ἕτερον ἀνίστασθαι ἱερέα καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Ἀαρὼν λέγεσθαι;
Εἰ μὲν οὖν τελείωσις διὰ τῆς Λευϊτικῆς ἱερωσύνης ἦν — ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἐπ᾿ αὐτῇ νενομοθέτητο — τίς ἔτι χρεία, κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισεδὲκ ἕτερον ἀνίστασθαι ἱερέα, καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Ἀαρὼν λέγεσθαι;
Εἰ μὲν οὖν τελείωσις διὰ τῆς Λευϊτικῆς ἱερωσύνης ἦν (ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἐπ᾽ αὐτῇ νενομοθέτητο), τίς ἔτι χρεία κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισεδὲκ ἕτερον ἀνίστασθαι ἱερέα καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Ἀαρὼν λέγεσθαι;
Εἰ μὲν οὖν τελείωσις διὰ τῆς Λευϊτικῆς ἱερωσύνης ἦν—ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἐπ᾽ ⸂αὐτῇ⸃ ⸂ 2νενομοθέτητο—⸃ τίς ἔτι χρεία, κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισεδὲκ ἕτερον ἀνίστασθαι ἱερέα, καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Ἀαρὼν λέγεσθαι;
ει μεν ουν τελειωσισ δια τησ λευιτικησ ιερωσυνησ ην ο λαοσ γαρ επ αυτη νενομοθετητο τισ ετι χρεια κατα την ταξιν μελχισεδεκ ετερον ανιστασθαι ιερεα και ου κατα την ταξιν ααρων λεγεσθαι
Εἰ μὲν οὖν τελείωσις διὰ τῆς Λευειτικῆς ἱερωσύνης ἦν, ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἐπ’ αὐτῆς νενομοθέτηται, τίς ἔτι χρεία κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισεδὲκ ἕτερον ἀνίστασθαι ἱερέα καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Ἀαρὼν λέγεσθαι;
Εἰ μὲν οὖν τελείωσις διὰ τῆς Λευιτικῆς ἱερωσύνης ἦν, ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἐπʼ ⸀αὐτῆς ⸀νενομοθέτηται τίς ἔτι χρεία κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισέδεκ ἕτερον ἀνίστασθαι ἱερέα καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Ἀαρὼν λέγεσθαι;
CC BY 4.0
Se sou baz travay prèt ras Levi yo Bondye te bay pèp Izrayèl la lalwa Moyiz la. Si travay prèt ras Levi yo te yon travay ki te bon nèt, pa ta gen nesesite menm pou yon lòt prèt ki menm jan ak Mèlkisedèk men ki pa menm jan ak Arawon ta vini.
A, ina i loaa ka mea e pono ai ma ka oihana kahuna a Levi, (ua haawi pu ia mai ke kanawai i kanaka me ia,) heaha la anei hoi ko laila hemahema e ku hou ai kekahi kahuna e mamuli o ke ano o Melekisedeka, aole hoi i kapaia mamuli o ke ano o Aarona?
יא וְאִם תַּכְלִית כָּל־חֵפֶץ נִמְצְאָה בִּכְהֻנַּת בְּנֵי לֵוִי אֲשֶׁר בְּיָמֶיהָ נִתְּנָה הַתּוֹרָה לָעָם מַה־לְּכֹהֵן אַחֵר כִּי יָקוּם עַל־דִּבְרָתִי מַלְכִּי־צֶדֶק וְלֹא יִקָּרֵא עַל־דִּבְרָתִי אַהֲרֹן׃
על כן אלו היתה שלמות על ידי כהנת בני לוי אשר בה נתנה התורה לעם למה זה צריך לקום עוד כהן אחר על דברתי מלכי צדק ולא יאמר על דברתי אהרן׃
Se adunque la perfezione era per il sacerdozio levitico (poichè in su quello fu data la legge al popolo), che era egli più bisogno che sorgesse un altro sacerdote secondo l'ordine di Melchisedec, e che non fosse nominato secondo l'ordine d'Aaronne?
Ora, se la perfezione fosse stata possibile per mezzo del sacerdozio levitico (perché su quello è basata la legge data al popolo), che bisogno c’era ancora che sorgesse un altro sacerdote secondo l’ordine di Melchisedec e non scelto secondo l’ordine d’Aronne?
さて、レビ系の祭司職によって完全に達することができたのなら――民はその祭司職のもとで律法を受けたのですが――なぜ、アロンの位に従うとは呼ばれず、メルキゼデクの位に従う別の祭司が立てられる必要があったのでしょうか。
さて、もしレビ系の祭司職によって完全に到達できたのだったら、――民はそれを基礎として律法を与えられたのです。――それ以上何の必要があって、アロンの位でなく、メルキゼデクの位に等しいと呼ばれる他の祭司が立てられたのでしょうか。
ଲେବିଅମରଞ୍ଜି ଆ ରାଓଡ଼ା ଗିୟ୍ଲେ ଇସ୍ରାଏଲନ୍ ଜାତିଞ୍ଜି ମୋସାନ୍ ଆ ବନାଁୟ୍ବର୍ ଞାଙେଞ୍ଜି, ରାଓଡ଼ା କାବ୍ବାଡ଼ାନ୍ ବାତ୍ତେ ଗଡେଲାଜେନ୍ ନଙ୍, ଆରୋଣନ୍ ଆ ଡାଙ୍ଗଡ଼ାଅନନ୍ ଅନ୍ତମ୍ କେନ୍ ଲେବିଅ ରାଓଡ଼ାଞ୍ଜିଆଡଙ୍ ଅମ୍ରେଙ୍ଲେ, ମଲ୍କିସେଦକନ୍ ଆ ଡାଙ୍ଗଡ଼ାଅନନ୍ ଅନ୍ତମ୍ ଆନ୍ନା ଅବୟ୍ ରାଓଡ଼ାନ୍ ଆ କେଜ୍ଜା ସନାୟ୍ସାୟ୍ ତଡ୍ ବନ୍ ।
CC BY 4.0
Are ri Dios xyoꞌwik ri taqanik chike ri tinimit Israel. We taqanik riꞌ xbꞌanik rumal cher xchomax rij chi ri e rijaꞌl ri Leví keꞌkitoꞌ ri winaq rech kuꞌx sukꞌ. Xa kꞌu rumal cher man xekwin taj ri chꞌawenelabꞌ cho ri Dios xkibꞌan waꞌ we riꞌ, tzi choqꞌaqꞌ wi chi xpe jun kꞌakꞌ chꞌawenel cho ri Dios: jun chꞌawenel cho ri Dios ri man rijaꞌl taj ri Aarón xane rijaꞌl ri Melquisedec.
CC BY 4.0
Inave uvokamelefu uvahawesehine uhugendela uvutawala wa Lawi, (Poapo avanu vipohela ululagelo), khuhale nulihitaji lihi hutawala uyunge ukhwinoha ufyano gwa Melkizedeki, sio ukhwelangiwa nopangelelo ugwa Haruni?
CC BY 4.0
레위 계통의 제사 직분으로 말미암아 온전함을 얻을 수 있었으면 백성이 그 아래서 율법을 받았으니 어찌하여 아론의 반차를 좇지 않고 멜기세덱의 반차를 좇는 별다른 한 제사장을 세울 필요가 있느뇨
Orekma lun mwet tol ke sruf lal Levi pa sie oakwuk yohk in Ma Sap ma tuh itukyang nu sin mwet Israel. Na, funu ku in oasr suwoswos lun mwet ke sripen orekma lun mwet tol Levi inge, lukun tia eneneyuk in oasr sie pacna mwet tol saya sikyak in oana Melchizedek, su tia ma ke sruf lal Aaron.
Linu haiba kuba yobuzwile mubuhalo bwachilumeli chintu chiwoleka chenzila yabuprisita bwa Chilivi (mukuti mwikonde lateni bantu babaamuheli mulao), bulotu nzi buchitokwahala kuba kwateni kwamuprisita zumwi kuba kwateni mumasule enzila ya Melekisedeke, ni kusahewa itokomelo kuba yichilila mikwa ya Aaroni?
CC BY 4.0
Si ergo consummatio per sacerdotium Leviticum erat (populus enim sub ipso legem accepit) quid adhuc necessarium fuit secundum ordinem Melchisedech, alium surgere sacerdotem, et non secundum ordinem Aaron dici?
Levi-singgi purohitki phamda yumpham oiraga Wayel Yathang adu Israel-gi misingda pibani. Adubu Levi-singgi thabak adugi mapanna mapung phahanba ngamlamlabadi, Aaron-dagi nattaba Melchizedek-ki mawongda oiba atoppa makhalgi purohit amamuk thorakpagi kanaba leiramloidabani.
CC BY 4.0
ନେ ଲେବୀକଆଃ ଯାଜାକ୍ ହବାଅଃ ହରାତେ ଇସ୍ରାଏଲ୍ ହଡ଼କକେ ଆନ୍ଚୁ ଏମାକାନା । ଲେବୀକଆଃ ଯାଜାକ୍ କାମି ହରାତେ ପକ୍ତାକାନ୍ ହବାଅଃତେୟାଃରେଦ, ହାରୁନ୍ଆଃ ଆକ୍ତେୟାର୍ତେ ନେ ଲେବୀକଆଃ ଯାଜାକ୍ କାମି ହକାକେଦ୍ତେ, ମଲ୍କିସେଦକ୍ଆଃ ଆକ୍ତେୟାର୍ ଲେକାତେ ଏଟାଃ ଆଡଃମିଆଁଦ୍ ଯାଜାକ୍ଆଃ ଲାଗାତିଙ୍ଗ୍ କା ତାଇକେନା ।
CC BY 4.0
Ijirel mina suh kota Hootthe jun di, romwah ah Leewi jaat apaat nawa angtheng. Amadi, leewi nok hah romwah loong mootkaat ah epun angta bah, belam Aroon jaatang likhiik lah ang thang Melkijadek jaatang likhiik we dong jamtheng tah taat angta.
CC BY 4.0
Kati ukamilifu utiwezekana patya kwa ukuhani wa Lawi, (Kwa eyo pae yake bandu hupokya saliya), pabile ni hitaji lyaako zaidi kwa kuhani ywenge kuinua baada ya nfumo wa Melkizedeki, na kemelwa kwaa baada ya mpangilio ba Haruni?
CC BY 4.0
Vandu va Isilaeli vapewili malagizu mumkingisa wa uteta wa Valawi. Ngati lihengu la uteta lavi kamilifu, ngayiganikiwi lepi kuhumila mteta yungi wa Chapanga mweiwanangana na Melikisedeki, na lepi Aloni.
CC BY 4.0
و دیگر اگر از کهانت لاوی، کمال حاصل میشد (زیرا قوم شریعت را بر آن یافتند)، باز چه احتیاج میبود که کاهنی دیگر بر رتبه ملکیصدق مبعوث شود و مذکور شود که بر رتبه هارون نیست؟
Ari, ma dodok en jamero Lewi unjokela pwe i anjau irail aleer kapun o da katepan amen jamero en pwarado ni al en Melkijedek, a kaidin ni al en Aron?
Ari, ma dodok en samero Lewi unsokela — pwe i ansau irail aleer kapung o — da katepan amen samero en pwarado ni al en Melkisedek, a kaidin ni al en Aron?
Portanto, se a perfeição fosse por meio do sacerdócio levítico (pois sob ele o povo recebeu a lei), que necessidade haveria ainda de que se levantasse outro sacerdote segundo a ordem de Melquisedeque, e não fosse chamado segundo a ordem de Arão?
Portanto, se a perfeição tivesse sido de fato pelo sacerdócio Levítico (pois sob ele o povo recebeu a Lei), que mais necessidade havia de se levantar outro Sacerdote segundo a ordem de Melquisedeque, e não ser chamado segundo a ordem de Arão?
CC BY 4.0
Și dacă desăvârșirea a fost prin preoția levitică, căci sub ea a primit poporul Legea, ce nevoie mai era ca un alt preot să se ridice după rânduiala lui Melchisedec, și să nu fie chemat după rânduiala lui Aaron?
De aceea dacă desăvârșirea ar fi fost prin preoția levitică, (fiindcă sub aceasta a primit poporul legea,) ce nevoie mai era ca un alt preot să se ridice după rânduiala lui Melchisedec și să nu fie chemat după rânduiala lui Aaron?
Și dacă desăvârșirea a fost prin preoția levitică, căci sub ea a primit poporul Legea, ce nevoie mai era ca un alt preot să se ridice după rânduiala lui Melchisedec, și să nu fie chemat după rânduiala lui Aaron?
Дакэ дар десэвырширя ар фи фост ку путинцэ прин преоция левицилор – кэч суб преоция ачаста а примит попорул Леӂя – че невое май ера сэ се ридиче ун алт преот „дупэ рындуяла луй Мелхиседек”, ши ну дупэ рындуяла луй Аарон?
Итак, если бы совершенство достигалось посредством левитского священства,- и с ним сопряжен закон народа,- то какая бы еще нужда была восставать иному священнику по чину Мелхиседека, а не по чину Аарона именоваться?
Eshi nkashe whawezehene ashilile wakuhani wa Lawi, (pansiyakwe abhantu bhaposhela endajizyo), whali awhanzeshi sana whakuhani owenje abhoshe yali mfano wa Melkizedeki, sio akwiziwe apanjilile wa Haruni?
CC BY 4.0
Israel mingei kôm han levirûi ochai nina nuoia Balam pêk ani. Atûn, ha ngei sintho hah achukphar aninte, Aaron anga niloiin Melchizedek anga ochai dang hon lang rang ite anângna omak.
CC BY 4.0
Ako je, dakle, savršenstvo postalo kroz levitsko sveštenstvo (jer je narod pod njim zakon primio), kakva je još potreba bila govoriti da će drugi sveštenik postati po redu Melhisedekovom, a ne po redu Aronovom?
Ако је, дакле, савршенство постало кроз левитско свештенство (јер је народ под њим закон примио), каква је још потреба била говорити да ће други свештеник постати по реду Мелхиседековом, а не по реду Ароновом?
Akabà obudâhwa bwa bene-Levi bwàli bwimâna, -bulya kuli bo Nyamuzinda ahâga olubaga Amarhegeko-, càcirhumaga owundi mudâhwa oli aka Melkisedeki aciyisha, cànarhumaga barhaderha oku ali aka Aroni?
CC BY 4.0
Pabushimilumbo bwa Balevi epalikuba pebakwa Milawo ya Lesa njalapa Baislayeli. Lino nekwalikubeti ncito ya beshimilumbo yalikuba yelela kwine, nshinga nekwalabula kuyandiketi shimilumbo naumbi ese, uyo lafumunga mu bushimilumbo bwa Melekizedeki, bwabula kuba bwa Aloni.
CC BY 4.0
Si pues la perfección era por el sacerdocio Levítico (porque debajo de él recibió el pueblo la ley) ¿qué necesidad había aún de que se levantase otro sacerdote según el orden de Melchîsedec, y que no fuese llamado según el orden de Aarón?
Si, pues, la perfección fuera por el sacerdocio levítico (porque bajo él recibió el pueblo la ley), ¿qué necesidad habría aún de que se levantara otro sacerdote, según el orden de Melquisedec, y que no fuera llamado según el orden de Aarón?
Si, pues, la perfección fuera por el sacerdocio levítico (porque bajo él recibió el pueblo la ley), ¿qué necesidad habría aún de que se levantase otro sacerdote, según el orden de Melquisedec, y que no fuese llamado según el orden de Aarón?
Ahora bien, si la perfección hubiera venido por medio del sacerdocio levítico, pues bajo este sacerdocio el pueblo recibió la Ley, ¿qué necesidad habría de que se levantara otro sacerdote según el orden de Melquisedec, y no según el orden de Aarón?
CC BY 4.0
Así que, si la perfección fuera por medio del sacerdocio levítico, porque basado en él, el pueblo recibió la Ley, ¿qué necesidad había aún de que se levantara otro sacerdote según el orden de Melquisedec, y que no fuera nombrado según el orden de Aarón?
CC BY 4.0
Kutokana na ukuhani wa Walawi, watu wa Israeli walipewa Sheria. Sasa, kama huduma ya Walawi ingalikuwa kamilifu hapangekuwa tena na haja ya kutokea ukuhani mwingine tofauti, ukuhani ambao umefuata utaratibu wa ukuhani wa Melkisedeki, na si ule wa Aroni.
Lebi vdwgv nyibu buli lokv Israel nyi vdwa Pvbv nga jitoku. Vjak, Lebi vdw gvlokv nyibubv rila rinamlo jvjvbv rvbwng nvgobolo, hv Aaron gvbv mimabv, Pvbv gv lvlam ha manv Melkijedek gv buli lokv angusinv nvgwngnv nyibu go kaatamla daklwk dubv dinchi madunvpv.
CC BY 4.0
Ko ia ka ne ai ha haohaoa ʻi he kau taulaʻeiki ʻoe faʻahinga ʻo Livai, (he naʻe maʻu ai ʻe he kakai ʻae fono,) ko e hā hono ʻaonga ʻoe fokotuʻu mo e taulaʻeiki ʻe taha ʻi he lakanga ʻo Melekiseteki, kae ʻikai ui ʻi he lakanga ʻo ʻElone?
Коли ж звершеннє було через Левійське сьвященство (бо під ним люде озаконені стались), то яка ж іще потреба иншому встати сьвященикові по чину Мелхиседековому, а не по чину Аароновому звати ся?
Коли ж звершеннє було через Левійське сьвященство (бо під ним люде озаконені стались), то яка ж іще потреба иншому встати сьвященикові по чину Мелхиседековому, а не по чину Аароновому звати ся?
Nếu có thể được sự trọn vẹn bởi chức tế lễ của người Lê-vi (vì luật pháp ban cho dân đang khi còn dưới quyền chức tế lễ), thì cớ sao còn cần phải dấy lên một thầy tế lễ khác, lập theo ban Mên-chi-xê-đéc, không theo ban A-rôn?
דעריבער, אויב די שלימות וואלט טאקע געווען דורך דער כהונה פון די לוויים, אונטער וועלכער די תורה איז געגעבן געווארן צום פאלק, צו וואס איז נאך נויטיק, אז אן אנדערער כהן גדול זאל אויפשטיין לויט דער ארדנונג פון מלכי‑צדק, און נישט גערופן ווערן לויט דער ארדנונג פון אהרן?
CC BY 4.0